Maryland Republicans trying to follow Trumpâs Lead to Restrict Abortion
Today marks the third anniversary of Donald Trumpâs handpicked Supreme Court justices ripping away womenâs recognized fundamental right to make decisions about their own body. Dobbs v. Jackson paved the way for Trump and his Republican allies to launch attacks on womenâs reproductive health and enact abortion bans nationwide.
In Trumpâs second term, reproductive health care is at even greater risk as Trump pushes his dangerous backdoor abortion ban through Congress and emboldens Republicans in legislatures across the country to further limit womenâs access to critical health care.
On the third anniversary of the Dobbs ruling, Maryland Democratic Party Executive Director Karen Darkes released the following statement:
âThree years ago today, Donald Trumpâs handpicked Supreme Court justices, who were supported by Larry Hogan, made good on Republicansâ decadeslong quest to rip away womenâs reproductive freedoms. In the years since, Republicans have enacted draconian, total abortion bans, restricted birth control access, and slashed health care funding. Now, Trump and his Republican minions are carrying out Project 2025âs blueprint by sneaking a backdoor abortion ban into their dangerous budget bill. As if slashing Marylandersâ health care wasnât craven enough, Republicans are hellbent on ensuring abortion care is out of reach for women across the country. Letâs be clear: right-wing politicians would rather let women die than recognize their right to make decisions about their bodies.â
In Maryland, Republicans are following Trumpâs lead by pushing anti-abortion legislation. In the 2025 Legislative Session alone, the following abortion restriction laws were proposed by Republicans (and defeated by Democrats):
-
A bill put forward by the Maryland Freedom Caucus would force Maryland to track and report women for having abortions. (This was a specific Project 2025 policy idea – page 455, line 24)
-
A bill to model the draconian laws from red states to outlaw abortion before many women even know they are pregnant.
-
A bill to implement forced procedures and wait times for women seeking an abortion.
Donald Trump âproudlyâ took credit for overturning Roe v. Wade and all the extreme abortion bans across the country.
Trump: âI was proudly the person responsible for the ending of ⌠Roe v. Wade.â
Trump: âFor 54 years they were trying to get Roe v. Wade terminated, and I did it, and Iâm proud to have done it. ⌠Nobody else was going to get that done but me, and we did it, and we did something that was a miracle.â
Rolling Stone: âTrump Claims Credit for All Abortion Bansâ
Rolling Stone: âTrump and Vance Have Backed States That Want to Surveil Pregnant Womenâ
In his second term, Trump continues to attack womenâs reproductive rights.Â
The New Republic: âTrump Sneaks Dangerous Rights for Fetuses Into Executive Orderâ
âBy describing a fetus as a person from conception, Trump has legitimized fetal personhood. ⌠The legal language employed by fetal personhood also effectively categorizes any person receiving an abortion at any stage as a murderer.â
Daily Beast: âTrump Administration Removes Reproductive Rights Websiteâ
NOTUS: âAnti-abortion advocates say having allies in the cabinet will set the tone for abortion policies in the administration. âŚ
âTrumpâs agency picks could make changes that would have nationwide implications on abortion access.â
Politico: âTrump admin moves to drop fight over emergency abortions, reversing Biden admin stanceâ
Reuters: âTrump administration to freeze family-planning funds for Planned Parenthoodâ
Meanwhile, Trumpâs Republican lapdogs in Congress are pushing his disastrous budget bill that would threaten Marylandersâ reproductive health care access.
NOTUS: âThe reconciliation bill has given Republicans a way to target abortion access in states that legally protect it: threatening their federal health care funding.
âHouse Republicans added a last-minute provision to their reconciliation bill via a managerâs amendment that would block certain Affordable Care Act funds from going to state health plans that cover abortion services. âŚ
âIf the provision becomes law, it could force state officials to choose between maintaining abortion accessibility and ensuring that residents maintain their health care coverage. âŚ
âThe Hyde Amendment already bans federal funds from being used directly on abortion. The Affordable Care Act prohibits recipients from using cost-sharing reductions â financial assistance to lower the out-of-pocket costs for low-income individuals â to pay for abortions.
âHowever, the reconciliation bill takes that limitation further, saying that health plans that cover abortion services cannot receive federally funded cost-sharing reductions at all. That could threaten financial assistance for all residents of a state. In 2024, half of all people enrolled in an ACA health plan qualified for cost-sharing reductions, per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.â